UX Field Note

What if the most human parts of user behaviour don’t show up in the data? This article explores what pauses, silences, and gestures can teach us, and how analogue methods help us notice what digital tools often miss.

Many UX research reports feel unreadable not because the findings are unclear, but because the writing flattens them. This piece explores how phrasing, tone, and narrative shape what gets heard — and what gets lost.

When user findings conflict, it’s tempting to resolve the tension quickly. But what if contradiction isn’t a problem to fix, but a pattern to follow? This article explores sensemaking in UX research as a patient, interpretive process — one that holds ambiguity long enough for structure to emerge.

Why does the call for rigour so often collapse into a checklist? Triangulation promises rigour. But too often, it delivers repetition. Researchers reach for it not to surface contradiction, but to secure consensus, three methods, three data types, one tidy insight. It becomes less a practice of inquiry than a form of pre-emption: anticipate critique…

A fictional scenario drawn from real research patterns, this article explores stakeholder listening not as admin, but as method. When user insights fail to land, it’s often not a matter of evidence, but translation, of making meaning legible across internal systems of power, fear, and decision-making.

We often ask participants to be transparent, but not our tools. This piece explores how platforms — from sentiment analysis to AI summaries — quietly shape meaning before we begin. What ethical questions should we ask of the systems we rely on?